Results for VideoJug
Description
VideoJug offers instructional videos for a wide range of topics. Many videos are produced in-house by VideoJug but users can also upload their own videos or create instructional slideshows. Users can comment on the videos. There is the ability to add text for each frame - an alternative to captioning if this has not been done at the time of making the video. Tagging and sharing with others on My Space etc is also possible. There is a discussion forum and categories of videos to help with searching.
Accessibility Testing Results
The site is easy to navigate and with videos to help with uploading and others about editing etc. it is possible to become and expert just by using the site! There are text transcripts with most videos. The contrast levels are good but text sizes tend to be rather small unless zoom is used. The player used is Flash based so only accessible via the keyboard in some browsers such as Internet Explorer.
| # | Test | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible | ![]() |
Signup form has no labels. Login form does have labels. Uses reCaptcha for uploading media which are hard to understand and read. |
| 2 | Image ALT Attributes | ![]() |
Consistent alternative text but rather lengthy |
| 3 | Link Target Definitions | ![]() |
All links, including images which would otherwise be ambiguous, have titles to uniquely identify them. |
| 4 | Frame Titles and Layout | ![]() |
Confusing names on advert iframes. |
| 5 | Removal of Stylesheet | ![]() |
The page is still understandable and functional when it is viewed as a linear document, with no styles. |
| 6 | Audio/Video Features | ![]() |
It is possible to add a full transcription for all the videos but captioning has to be added when the video is edited in another application. |
| 7 | Video/animations - audio descriptions | ![]() |
Pending results of this test. |
| 8 | Appropriate use of Tables | ![]() |
Tables are not used for the design of this website. |
| 9 | Tab Orderings Correct and Logical | ![]() |
Tab order is in a logical and consistent top-to-bottom or left-to-right format. |
| 10 | Page Functionality with Keyboard | ![]() |
Flash video player - unusable without a pointing device. |
| 11 | Accessibility of Text Editors | ![]() |
This site has no rich text editor. |
| 12 | Appropriate Feedback with Forms | ![]() |
The product provides suitable feedback when the user performs an action. |
| 13 | Contrast and Colour Check | ![]() |
Titles of articles are clear to read and pass WCAG AA guidelines with good colour contrast levels. |
| 14 | Page Integrity when Zooming | ![]() |
The website maintains the layout and usability of all critical areas perfectly when zoomed. |
| 15 | Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability | ![]() |
Particularly small text prevalent throughout the site, which may be difficult to view without zooming the page. |
Disability-Tailored Results
The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.
Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.
| Disability | Average Score |
|---|---|
| Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia) | 80% |
| Deaf/Hard of Hearing | 67% |
| Visual Stress | 67% |
| Cognitive Learning Disabilities | 67% |
| Blind and Severe Visual Impairments | 67% |
| Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity | 62% |
| Dexterity/Mobility | 59% |
| Colour Deficiencies | 33% |







