Results for 21Classes

Web 2.0 Service
Test Average: 80%
Updated 25 August 2009

Description

This system is built using two layers. On the first layer, Teachers create a virtual 'classroom' where they can communicate with students. On the second layer, Students can blog within the classroom. Within the classroom, teachers can write news items and assignments. Students can submit assignments using an online form, which sends an email to the teacher. Sample site: http://sotontest.21classes.com.

Accessibility Testing Results

The forms are accessible and relatively easy to use despite the lack of labels in places. The site is keyboard accessible and the rich text editor easy to use. Zoom levels are good and the majority of the text and contrast levels make reading easy when the template is chosen with care.

# Test Score Summary
1Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible Good Although the labels are missing when it comes to using the screen reader some text forms are read and others fail.
2Image ALT Attributes Fair Difficult to alt-tag images in the rich text editor unless you can write HTML.
3Link Target Definitions Excellent All links, including images which would otherwise be ambiguous, have titles to uniquely identify them.
4Frame Titles and Layout Excellent No frames or iframes, which can be disorientating for screen-readers, are used in the design.
5Removal of Stylesheet Excellent The page is still understandable and functional when it is viewed as a linear document, with no styles.
6Audio/Video Features Good Videos can be uploaded. Captioning has to have been already added to the video but a text transcription can be added to the blog.
7Video/animations - audio descriptions Good Audio descriptions can be added to videos before they are uploaded to a blog but they are not part of the service. Text descriptions can be part of the blog.
8Appropriate use of Tables Excellent Tables are not used for the design of this website.
9Tab Orderings Correct and Logical Excellent Tab order is in a logical and consistent top-to-bottom or left-to-right format.
10Page Functionality with Keyboard Excellent The website is fully accessible without the use of a mouse.
11Accessibility of Text Editors Excellent This site uses the TinyMCE editor, which is accessible.
12Appropriate Feedback with Forms Good This site often provides suitable feedback.
13Contrast and Colour Check Fair Some headings impossible to read due to light green on white theme. Theme could be changed, but the default is inadequate.
14Page Integrity when Zooming Excellent The website maintains the layout and usability of all critical areas perfectly when zoomed.
15Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability Good The majority of text on the site is size ten, which is readable but may be uncomfortable for some.

Disability-Tailored Results

The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.

Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.

Disability Average Score
Dexterity/Mobility92%
Blind and Severe Visual Impairments83%
Cognitive Learning Disabilities81%
Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity79%
Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia)73%
Deaf/Hard of Hearing67%
Visual Stress67%
Colour Deficiencies56%

Activities you can do with 21Classes