Results for Twitter

Web 2.0 Service
Test Average: 93%
Updated 10 August 2009

Description

Twitter is an online application that is part blog, part social networking site, and part mobile phone/instant messaging tool. It is designed to let users describe what they are doing or thinking at any given moment in 140 characters or less. As a tool for students and faculty, Twitter could be used academically to foster interaction and support metacognition. Sadly however, there are a few access problems although the RNIB have joined the Twitter scene but the good news is that you can now use a different version called Accessible Twitter or try Jawter: Twitter from Jaws with no software in the middle.

Accessibility Testing Results

The registration is through the Re-Captcha system - not ideal for everyone and not labelled so although it can be tracked in WebbIE some screen readers may miss the audio version. The forms in Twitter are not labelled although they are keyboard accessible. Otherwise it is a very simple concept that is provided with good contrast and text sizes and zooms well.

# Test Score Summary
1Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible Good Signup form uses ReCaptcha which is meant to be accessible to screenreader users by offering an audio version but may cause comprehension difficulties due to lack of clear audio output. The visual form can also be difficult to interpret.
2Image ALT Attributes Excellent Very few images. Image links to other user pages are tagged. Some icons and smaller images lack alts.
3Link Target Definitions Good Most links, including images which would otherwise be ambiguous, have titles to uniquely identify them, but there are some "click here" links.
4Frame Titles and Layout Excellent No frames or iframes, which can be disorientating for screen-readers, are used in the design.
5Removal of Stylesheet Excellent The page is still understandable and functional when it is viewed as a linear document, with no styles.
6Audio/Video Features Excellent The site only allows for 140 characters of text and no images or audio.
7Video/animations - audio descriptions Excellent The site only allows for 140 characters of text and no images or audio.
8Appropriate use of Tables Excellent Tables are not used for the design of this website.
9Tab Orderings Correct and Logical Excellent Tab order is in a logical and consistent top-to-bottom or left-to-right format. The order also holds within tables and forms.
10Page Functionality with Keyboard Excellent The website is fully accessible without the use of a mouse.
11Accessibility of Text Editors Excellent This site has no rich text editor. It is possible to tab directly into the message form.
12Appropriate Feedback with Forms Excellent The product provides suitable feedback when the user performs an action, with no time restriction.
13Contrast and Colour Check Good Generally adequate contrast between text and background, although some non-critical text has a poorer luminosity ratio.
14Page Integrity when Zooming Excellent The website maintains the layout and usability of all critical areas perfectly when zoomed.
15Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability Excellent The majority of text on the site is size 12 and sans-serif. There is no flashing or blinking content.

Disability-Tailored Results

The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.

Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.

Disability Average Score
Deaf/Hard of Hearing100%
Blind and Severe Visual Impairments95%
Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia)93%
Cognitive Learning Disabilities92%
Dexterity/Mobility92%
Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity92%
Colour Deficiencies89%
Visual Stress89%

Activities you can do with Twitter