Results for SlideShare

Web 2.0 Service
Test Average: 49%
Updated 24 August 2009

Description

Users can upload their presentations to SlideShare in a range of regular formats. The slides are converted to images, and shown in a way similar to many online image slideshows. Slides can be shown full-screen, and the player features regular forward/back controls. There are community groups and widgets including the ability to add slideshows to blogs and have tags.

Accessibility Testing Results

It is very easy to upload slides and the forms are keyboard accessible but the player is only usable with a keyboard in certain browsers such as Internet Explorer. The readability of the slides depends on the user but the site has good contrast levels and text can be zoomed.

# Test Score Summary
1Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible Poor There are missing labels for forms within this product - this may create problems with some screenreaders.
2Image ALT Attributes Poor This product is Flash-based which makes it harder to add alt tags for images. A concise description of the Flash object could be placed in the "description" field, so it can be read by a screen reader.
3Link Target Definitions Excellent All links, including images which would otherwise be ambiguous, have titles to uniquely identify them.
4Frame Titles and Layout Excellent No frames or iframes, which can be disorientating for screen-readers, are used in the design.
5Removal of Stylesheet Good The product does not fully maintain logical continuity when the style sheet is removed.
6Audio/Video Features Good A text description is often offered, while captioning via a transcript is optional.
7Video/animations - audio descriptions Fair Text description only is possible.
8Appropriate use of Tables Fair A table is used, but without correct headings. This may cause interpretation problems for some screenreaders.
9Tab Orderings Correct and Logical Good Tab order is mainly correct and logical, although some items are not.
10Page Functionality with Keyboard Poor The product is built around a Flash component, which is not accessible to keyboard users.
11Accessibility of Text Editors Poor Text editor is not accessible with the screenreader or keyboard.
12Appropriate Feedback with Forms Good The site does not always offer clear feedback and closure.
13Contrast and Colour Check Good No contrast issues.
14Page Integrity when Zooming Excellent The website maintains the layout and usability of all critical areas perfectly when zoomed.
15Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability Fair Particularly small text prevalent throughout the site, which may be difficult to view without zooming the page.

Disability-Tailored Results

The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.

Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.

Disability Average Score
Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia)67%
Visual Stress67%
Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity58%
Deaf/Hard of Hearing56%
Cognitive Learning Disabilities50%
Blind and Severe Visual Impairments45%
Colour Deficiencies44%
Dexterity/Mobility17%

Activities you can do with SlideShare