Results for Wayfaring
Description
Annotate a map with three kinds of tools- a waypoint (one that can be used in multiple maps), a note, or a path/route. The flow of the story is less apparent, unless one does it with a combination of routes to show a path. It is possible to share ones map and also explore other peoples' maps.
Accessibility Testing Results
Clearly not all the elements have alt tags and the maps are those powered by Google with similar mouse over text and size control. Added features cannot be read by a screenreader. The main links are accessible but the maps cannot be manipulated by keyboard only. Text sizes can be small but zoom is good.
| # | Test | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible | ![]() |
The signin and signup forms are both javascript-driven and there are no labels. They may cause problems for screenreader users but they are keyboard accessible |
| 2 | Image ALT Attributes | ![]() |
Very few critical images have alternative text. |
| 3 | Link Target Definitions | ![]() |
All links, including images which would otherwise be ambiguous, have titles to uniquely identify them. |
| 4 | Frame Titles and Layout | ![]() |
No frames or iframes, which can be disorientating for screen-readers, are used in the design. |
| 5 | Removal of Stylesheet | ![]() |
The map does not work without its associated stylesheet. |
| 6 | Audio/Video Features | ![]() |
It is possible to add a short description to the points on the map. |
| 7 | Video/animations - audio descriptions | ![]() |
There is no chance to add audio descriptions but text can be added. |
| 8 | Appropriate use of Tables | ![]() |
Tables are used to construct this site - this may cause some screenreaders to read the content in the wrong order in this case the choice of maps and not the content in the maps. |
| 9 | Tab Orderings Correct and Logical | ![]() |
Tab order appears to be logical and makes access possible by keyboard users. However, tables are used for layout so some ordering may not be the way one would wish to work. |
| 10 | Page Functionality with Keyboard | ![]() |
This product requires a drag-and-drop operation with a pointing device to pan around the map. |
| 11 | Accessibility of Text Editors | ![]() |
There is no rich text editor in this product. |
| 12 | Appropriate Feedback with Forms | ![]() |
Feedback is poor when the user attempts to log in with incorrect details - especially if they make two invalid attempts. |
| 13 | Contrast and Colour Check | ![]() |
No contrast issues. |
| 14 | Page Integrity when Zooming | ![]() |
The website maintains the layout and usability of all critical areas perfectly when zoomed. |
| 15 | Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability | ![]() |
The majority of text on the site is size ten, which is readable but may be uncomfortable for some. |
Disability-Tailored Results
The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.
Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.
| Disability | Average Score |
|---|---|
| Visual Stress | 78% |
| Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity | 63% |
| Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia) | 60% |
| Deaf/Hard of Hearing | 56% |
| Colour Deficiencies | 56% |
| Cognitive Learning Disabilities | 53% |
| Blind and Severe Visual Impairments | 44% |
| Dexterity/Mobility | 42% |






