Results for Google Maps

Web 2.0 Service
Test Average: 51%
Updated 11 January 2010

Description

Google Maps allows users to find areas all over the world, share locations. Editing each map allows annotation of locations with images (e.g. using links from flickr), and other rich text features. Now they provide cut and paste code (via the "Link to this Page") so you can embed the maps in any web page. It is also possible to share maps via e-mail and find directions and businesses and add photos and wiki links.

Accessibility Testing Results

The main problem is that it is hard to add alt tags to any pictorial alterations or make maps accessible. Frames upset the linearisation of the site and tab order is also affected although initial links are good. Feedback from forms is good and so is colour contrast. Text sizes are small in places but the site zooms well. The maps are clear and easy to use if vision is good.

# Test Score Summary
1Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible Good There are no labels on any forms, but an alternative Captcha is offered. There are problems for screenreader users and the audio option is not clear.
2Image ALT Attributes Good This site offers map content, which would be near-impossible to represent in a text-form. Photos and other items have alt attributes if these have been added by users and are accessible via keyboard.
3Link Target Definitions Excellent All links, including images which would otherwise be ambiguous, have titles to uniquely identify them.
4Frame Titles and Layout Fair This site does use forms, and at least one frame has an ambiguous name. This may create problems for some screenreaders.
5Removal of Stylesheet Poor The map disappears when styles are removed from the page.
6Audio/Video Features Fair Maps created by users can have a text description associated with them.
7Video/animations - audio descriptions Poor There is no chance to add an audio description unless the map in embedded into a personal website with that option.
8Appropriate use of Tables Poor Tables are used to construct this site - this may cause some screenreaders to read the content in the wrong order.
9Tab Orderings Correct and Logical Good When a keyboard is used, items are usually presented in a logical order, although some are not.
10Page Functionality with Keyboard Poor This product requires a drag and drop operation with a pointing device to pan the map.
11Accessibility of Text Editors Good No rich text editor is used on this site.
12Appropriate Feedback with Forms Excellent The product provides suitable feedback when the user performs an action.
13Contrast and Colour Check Good No contrast issues. Colours are clear and offer comfortable viewing.
14Page Integrity when Zooming Excellent The website maintains the layout and usability of all critical areas perfectly when zoomed.
15Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability Good The majority of text on the site is size ten, which is readable but may be uncomfortable for some.

Disability-Tailored Results

The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.

Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.

Disability Average Score
Visual Stress78%
Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia)67%
Deaf/Hard of Hearing67%
Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity63%
Cognitive Learning Disabilities56%
Dexterity/Mobility50%
Colour Deficiencies45%
Blind and Severe Visual Impairments45%

Activities you can do with Google Maps