Results for Facebook

Web 2.0 Service
Test Average: 69%
Updated 10 August 2009

Description

People use Facebook to find and keep up to date with friends. The site is content-driven; users publish their own photos, comments, videos, etc and other users read them. Popular with students as it can be used to arrange events and has a built-in invitation and RSVP system. Members can form groups around interests, clubs and societies. Accessibility information can be found at AFB's blog and the CAPTCHA is offered as an audio sign in. Facebook Accessibility pages are also very helpful. m.facebook.com is an accessible option, although it is designed for the mobile phone.

Accessibility Testing Results

There is a blind user group on Facebook and much has been written about its accessibility. It can be viewed without all the advertisements and widgets. However, not all images have alt tags and some links are not self explanatory. Areas around the site tend to linearise well and navigation is good with access to basic text forms and clear explanations once these have been completed. Colour contrast levels and text make reading easy.

# Test Score Summary
1Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible Good Labels exist for the signin page but not the signup form. The signup form uses a Captcha which attempts to be accessible to screenreader users by offering an audio version but both the audio and visual forms of the Captcha can be difficult to interpret. A screenreader user may experience problems when signing up to the website.
2Image ALT Attributes Poor Image alternative text is not offered, even when an image has a description. Email addresses are shown as images which lack alt tags. This often prevents screenreader users from understanding image content.
3Link Target Definitions Poor Small images, which are used as links to larger photos, do not have titles to clarify the destination of the link and there are some occurrences of "click here" links.
4Frame Titles and Layout Good No frames, which can be disorientating for screen-readers, are used in the design. However, some iframes are used past the login page.
5Removal of Stylesheet Excellent The page is still understandable and functional when it is viewed as a linear document, with no styles.
6Audio/Video Features Excellent Text captions and descriptions are offered for images and videos, where the owner has set them.
7Video/animations - audio descriptions Poor There is no option to add audio descriptions linked to Videos or animations.
8Appropriate use of Tables Excellent Tables are not used for the design of this website.
9Tab Orderings Correct and Logical Excellent Tab order is in a logical and consistent top-to-bottom or left-to-right format.
10Page Functionality with Keyboard Excellent The website is fully accessible without the use of a mouse.
11Accessibility of Text Editors Good Most of the text input on the site is fully accessible. However, there are one or two which are inaccessible without a mouse.
12Appropriate Feedback with Forms Excellent The product provides suitable feedback when the user performs an action, informing the user of what to do next. No time restrictions are enforced.
13Contrast and Colour Check Good Contrast acceptable, although lots of text on the site fails WAI AAA validation (light blue on white).
14Page Integrity when Zooming Excellent The website maintains the layout and usability of all critical areas perfectly when zoomed.
15Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability Good The majority of text on the site is size ten and some is smaller, which is readable but may be uncomfortable for some. Sans-serif fonts used for all content, and there is no flashing or blinking content.

Disability-Tailored Results

The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.

Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.

Disability Average Score
Deaf/Hard of Hearing89%
Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia)87%
Dexterity/Mobility84%
Visual Stress78%
Cognitive Learning Disabilities72%
Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity67%
Blind and Severe Visual Impairments67%
Colour Deficiencies45%

Activities you can do with Facebook