Results for VoiceThread

Web 2.0 Service
Test Average: 44%
Updated 10 August 2009

Description

Users upload images which become simple slideshows called Threads. Users can comment on 'Threads' by recording their voice and/or doodling on the image. When the comment is played back, the doodle is drawn as it was by the user, showing the creation. Users can also comment with text and video.

Accessibility Testing Results

This site is mainly made using Flash and keyboard access has been compromised. The player is only usable with a keyboard in certain browsers such as Internet Explorer. It is impossible to change the text or contrast levels and user control is minimal, although the text size is good and feedback when uploading files is good. This service offers scope for adding audio descriptions and captions but its format means that using it with a screen reader is impossible.

# Test Score Summary
1Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible Poor All forms are within a Flash component, and therefore cannot be accessed with a keyboard.
2Image ALT Attributes Poor The site is built using Flash, which cannot offer text alternatives for images.
3Link Target Definitions Poor Every button is within the Flash component, which cannot provide titles or meaning for a screenreader.
4Frame Titles and Layout Excellent No frames or iframes, which can be disorientating for screen-readers, are used in the design.
5Removal of Stylesheet Excellent The page is still understandable and functional when it is viewed as a linear document, with no styles.
6Audio/Video Features Good It is a shame that the interface is not keyboard or screenreader accessible as it is possible to join in with the conversation in many different ways.
7Video/animations - audio descriptions Good It would be possible to add audio descriptions and any other formats if one could access the service.
8Appropriate use of Tables Excellent Tables are not used for the design of this website.
9Tab Orderings Correct and Logical Poor Cannot tab within this site because it is built using Flash.
10Page Functionality with Keyboard Poor Cannot control the site using the keyboard because it is built using Flash.
11Accessibility of Text Editors Poor Text editor is not accessible with the screenreader or keyboard.
12Appropriate Feedback with Forms Excellent The product provides suitable feedback when the user performs an action.
13Contrast and Colour Check Fair Very dark, grey themed player interface.
14Page Integrity when Zooming Poor The page cannot be zoomed.
15Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability Excellent The majority of text on the site is size 12 and sans-serif.

Disability-Tailored Results

The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.

Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.

Disability Average Score
Deaf/Hard of Hearing89%
Colour Deficiencies67%
Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia)67%
Blind and Severe Visual Impairments45%
Visual Stress44%
Cognitive Learning Disabilities39%
Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity38%
Dexterity/Mobility0%

Activities you can do with VoiceThread