Results for Our Wishing Well
Web 2.0 Service
Test Average: 73%
Updated 11 January 2010Description
Our Wishing Well is an online gift registry company. It is possible to set up lists of gifts that guests are able to purchase for the couple online.
Accessibility Testing Results
The site is not fully accessible which is a shame as it does have a site map and most issues can be worked around by using the WebbIE text browser if a screen reader is used. The main problems are the image links and text editors which is not keyboard accessible.
| # | Test | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible | ![]() |
Labels for form fields are missing and not associated correctly with input elements. Problems occur with NVDA screen reader although they can be seen in a the text browser WebbIE. |
| 2 | Image ALT Attributes | ![]() |
Some images are used as links and do not have alternative text. Other images also do not appear to have alt tags. Screen reader users will miss some features on the site. |
| 3 | Link Target Definitions | ![]() |
Some image links are poorly defined and there are also some vague links with examples such as 'learn more'. |
| 4 | Frame Titles and Layout | ![]() |
Frames not used for design. |
| 5 | Removal of Stylesheet | ![]() |
Content and navigation accessible without stylesheet. |
| 6 | Audio/Video Features | ![]() |
Not applicable. |
| 7 | Video/animations - audio descriptions | ![]() |
Not applicable. |
| 8 | Appropriate use of Tables | ![]() |
Tables are used for layout, they do not appear to impact on screen reader navigation. |
| 9 | Tab Orderings Correct and Logical | ![]() |
Logical tab order, tabindex used in some pages. Once tabbed into the text editor, keyboard exit alone does not seem possible. |
| 10 | Page Functionality with Keyboard | ![]() |
Some elements in the text editor's toolbar are inaccessible without the mouse. |
| 11 | Accessibility of Text Editors | ![]() |
Partial accessibility with access to some tools. |
| 12 | Appropriate Feedback with Forms | ![]() |
Suitable text feedback. |
| 13 | Contrast and Colour Check | ![]() |
Acceptable site contrast. |
| 14 | Page Integrity when Zooming | ![]() |
Layout and readability of the page unaffected by zooming. |
| 15 | Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability | ![]() |
Most of the fonts are between size 10-12, serif style with no blinking elements. Readability may be hampered in places with background images. |
Disability-Tailored Results
The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.
Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.
| Disability | Average Score |
|---|---|
| Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia) | 93% |
| Deaf/Hard of Hearing | 89% |
| Colour Deficiencies | 89% |
| Visual Stress | 89% |
| Cognitive Learning Disabilities | 75% |
| Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity | 75% |
| Blind and Severe Visual Impairments | 69% |
| Dexterity/Mobility | 50% |





