Results for IMDb

Web 2.0 Service
Test Average: 71%
Updated 31 December 2009

Description

IMDb (Internet Movie Database) is a searchable, encyclopaedic resource for information about current and historical television and film. Editors, users, The Hollywood Reporter, Variety, and studio briefs bring the latest news to this extensive database. Additional features for film and TV professionals are available with the Pro paid subscription.

Accessibility Testing Results

IMDb is in general terms an easy to use and accessible website. But as it is highly based on images and videos, efforts should be channelled into making the multimedia data more accessible before uploading them. Captions and transcripts for the videos are really important so that the end users have a more accessible experience.

# Test Score Summary
1Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible Fair There is no Captcha alternative. Forms miss some important labels which impact on screen reader use.
2Image ALT Attributes Fair The majority of images don't have alternative text, many are used as links and are not screen reader friendly. Some text appears in an image - this can be seen in Webbie text browser but is not read by NVDA.
3Link Target Definitions Good Most image links don't have appropriate titles or descriptions but text links are acceptable.
4Frame Titles and Layout Good There are some iframe elements with no additional links to the content. These do not appear to impact on screen reader use.
5Removal of Stylesheet Good The page is still understandable and functional when it is viewed as a linear document, with no styles.
6Audio/Video Features Excellent Videos can have a text description and text captions can be added to the video before uploading, although many videos lack this.
7Video/animations - audio descriptions Excellent Audio descriptions could be uploaded.
8Appropriate use of Tables Fair Some tables are used for layout and there are some data tables with no headings and captions.
9Tab Orderings Correct and Logical Good Tab order is generally good, with a left to right format."Skip to content" link is missing.
10Page Functionality with Keyboard Poor The keyboard alone cannot be used with some flash player controls, with the main navigation menu and for the voting activity. This is browser dependent and in Internet Explorer it may be possible to reach more features.
11Accessibility of Text Editors Excellent There is no rich text editor.
12Appropriate Feedback with Forms Excellent There are no time restrictions. Suitable explanatory text is provided for feedback with forms.
13Contrast and Colour Check Excellent The black on white contrast is acceptable. High contrast mode can be achieved using external tools or built in accessibility options.
14Page Integrity when Zooming Excellent Layout and readability of the page are unaffected by zooming.
15Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability Excellent There is no blinking or moving text, sans-serif fonts are used throughout, the majority of text has font size 11.

Disability-Tailored Results

The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.

Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.

Disability Average Score
Deaf/Hard of Hearing100%
Colour Deficiencies100%
Visual Stress100%
Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia)93%
Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity79%
Cognitive Learning Disabilities78%
Blind and Severe Visual Impairments64%
Dexterity/Mobility50%

Activities you can do with IMDb