Results for Epernicus

Web 2.0 Service
Test Average: 82%
Updated 30 December 2009

Description

Epernicus is a professional networking platform for research scientists and is open to those working in life sciences, via a form sent in for acceptance. The service is based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA and is a resource built by scientists to advance research and scientific careers.

Accessibility Testing Results

Over all, the entire website is accessible and usable for readers. However, there are some features that should be improved for those wishing to add text to forms and register if using a screen reader. Keyboard accessibility is good. Contrast levels may cause problems for some readers and the video offered as a presentation of the site has no captions or audio descriptions but this is not part of the general social networking aspect of the site.

# Test Score Summary
1Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible Fair Keyboard accessibility is good. Captcha login is not used, but labels to the registration forms are missing. These edit boxes can not be accessed by the text based browser WebbIE and the NVDA screen reader cannot describe the edit boxes.
2Image ALT Attributes Good Alt tags are used for all the photographs of researchers and are linked to their names. However, some other tags could be more descriptive, such as those linked to graphs etc, although a summary is usually available in the text.
3Link Target Definitions Good Most links are clear, however some of the journal articles are linked by very long titles which can take some time to work through with a screen reader.
4Frame Titles and Layout Excellent No frames are used in this site which appears to have a series of templates for users to fill when adding data.
5Removal of Stylesheet Excellent The pages are well organized even without the use of CSS
6Audio/Video Features Excellent Not applicable within the general website. However, there is a YouTube video about a presentation related to network - it is not captioned and there is no accompanying text but it does not affect usage of the site.
7Video/animations - audio descriptions Excellent Not applicable within the general website. However, there is a YouTube video about a presentation related to network - it is not captioned and there is no accompanying text but it does not affect usage of the site.
8Appropriate use of Tables Excellent Tables do not appear to be used for layout and the pages can be read in a linnear fashion.
9Tab Orderings Correct and Logical Excellent Tab order is good, but there are times when it is not very easy to see the outline to show where the link is being highlighted. This does depend in the browser being used.
10Page Functionality with Keyboard Good All the page are keyboard accessible with Mozilla Firefox (except for the YouTube video player), but some critical function cannot be accessed using the text browser WebbIE, such as the login forms. There are pop up windows that are keyboard accessible.
11Accessibility of Text Editors Excellent The website is fully accessible using keyboard. No rich text editor used.
12Appropriate Feedback with Forms Excellent No time restrictions, also feedback is clear and provides good instructions for all required actions.
13Contrast and Colour Check Fair Colour contrast levels are not acceptable when tested using the 'Color Contrast Analyzer' but it is not hard to read the majority of the text if you have no visual difficulties. Some pale grey text could be a stronger colour to help users.
14Page Integrity when Zooming Excellent The website maintains the layout and usability of all critical areas perfectly when zoomed.
15Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability Good The majority of text on the site is size ten, which is readable but much of the menu system at the bottom of the pages is a smaller font size. There is no flashing or blinking content.

Disability-Tailored Results

The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.

Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.

Disability Average Score
Deaf/Hard of Hearing89%
Blind and Severe Visual Impairments86%
Cognitive Learning Disabilities81%
Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia)80%
Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity79%
Dexterity/Mobility75%
Colour Deficiencies67%
Visual Stress67%

Activities you can do with Epernicus