Results for Accessible Twitter
Description
Accessible Twitter is designed to be an optimized alternative of the main Twitter.com website in terms of accessibility. It works synchronously with Twitter, so if you write something in Accessible Twitter it can be seen in the original version. It is exactly the same microblogging service but easy to use with a keyboard and screen reader.
Accessibility Testing Results
The site is successful in improving on some of the features from the main Twitter site, for example no "click here" links were found, and the contrast is better. However signup still requires the main Twitter signup form to be used, which uses a ReCaptcha system, which may cause some difficulties.
| # | Test | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible | ![]() |
If you don't already have a Twitter account, then the main Twitter signup form has to be used which uses a ReCaptcha system which offers an audio alternative for screenreader users. However both the audio and visual versions of this can be difficult to interpret. The login form on Accessible Twitter is labelled well and makes it easy for any user to login. |
| 2 | Image ALT Attributes | ![]() |
Very few images are used, and where they are, alternative descriptions are provided for screenreader users. |
| 3 | Link Target Definitions | ![]() |
Links, including images have titles to uniquely identify them. |
| 4 | Frame Titles and Layout | ![]() |
No frames or iframes are used in the design of the site. |
| 5 | Removal of Stylesheet | ![]() |
The site is fully accessible without the stylesheet. |
| 6 | Audio/Video Features | ![]() |
N/A - The site does not deal with multimedia content. |
| 7 | Video/animations - audio descriptions | ![]() |
N/A - The site does not deal with multimedia content. |
| 8 | Appropriate use of Tables | ![]() |
Tables are not used in the design of the site. |
| 9 | Tab Orderings Correct and Logical | ![]() |
Tab ordering is correct and logical, in a top-to-bottom or left-to-right format. The link that currently has tab focus is highlighted, making it easier to see the selected link. |
| 10 | Page Functionality with Keyboard | ![]() |
The page is fully functional without the use of a mouse. |
| 11 | Accessibility of Text Editors | ![]() |
The site has no rich text editor, so the same result from Test 1 is used. |
| 12 | Appropriate Feedback with Forms | ![]() |
The site provides appropriate feedback when the user performs an action. |
| 13 | Contrast and Colour Check | ![]() |
Site contrast is acceptable, ensuring text is comfortable to read. |
| 14 | Page Integrity when Zooming | ![]() |
The layout and readability of the site is unaffected by zooming. |
| 15 | Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability | ![]() |
Text is generally size 12, in sans-serif font, and there is no flashing or blinking content. |
Disability-Tailored Results
The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.
Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.
| Disability | Average Score |
|---|---|
| Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia) | 100% |
| Deaf/Hard of Hearing | 100% |
| Colour Deficiencies | 100% |
| Visual Stress | 100% |
| Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity | 100% |
| Cognitive Learning Disabilities | 95% |
| Blind and Severe Visual Impairments | 95% |
| Dexterity/Mobility | 84% |




