Results for Accessible Twitter

Web 2.0 Service
Test Average: 96%
Updated 10 August 2009

Description

Accessible Twitter is designed to be an optimized alternative of the main Twitter.com website in terms of accessibility. It works synchronously with Twitter, so if you write something in Accessible Twitter it can be seen in the original version. It is exactly the same microblogging service but easy to use with a keyboard and screen reader.

Accessibility Testing Results

The site is successful in improving on some of the features from the main Twitter site, for example no "click here" links were found, and the contrast is better. However signup still requires the main Twitter signup form to be used, which uses a ReCaptcha system, which may cause some difficulties.

# Test Score Summary
1Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible Good If you don't already have a Twitter account, then the main Twitter signup form has to be used which uses a ReCaptcha system which offers an audio alternative for screenreader users. However both the audio and visual versions of this can be difficult to interpret. The login form on Accessible Twitter is labelled well and makes it easy for any user to login.
2Image ALT Attributes Excellent Very few images are used, and where they are, alternative descriptions are provided for screenreader users.
3Link Target Definitions Excellent Links, including images have titles to uniquely identify them.
4Frame Titles and Layout Excellent No frames or iframes are used in the design of the site.
5Removal of Stylesheet Excellent The site is fully accessible without the stylesheet.
6Audio/Video Features Excellent N/A - The site does not deal with multimedia content.
7Video/animations - audio descriptions Excellent N/A - The site does not deal with multimedia content.
8Appropriate use of Tables Excellent Tables are not used in the design of the site.
9Tab Orderings Correct and Logical Excellent Tab ordering is correct and logical, in a top-to-bottom or left-to-right format. The link that currently has tab focus is highlighted, making it easier to see the selected link.
10Page Functionality with Keyboard Excellent The page is fully functional without the use of a mouse.
11Accessibility of Text Editors Good The site has no rich text editor, so the same result from Test 1 is used.
12Appropriate Feedback with Forms Excellent The site provides appropriate feedback when the user performs an action.
13Contrast and Colour Check Excellent Site contrast is acceptable, ensuring text is comfortable to read.
14Page Integrity when Zooming Excellent The layout and readability of the site is unaffected by zooming.
15Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability Excellent Text is generally size 12, in sans-serif font, and there is no flashing or blinking content.

Disability-Tailored Results

The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.

Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.

Disability Average Score
Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia)100%
Deaf/Hard of Hearing100%
Colour Deficiencies100%
Visual Stress100%
Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity100%
Cognitive Learning Disabilities95%
Blind and Severe Visual Impairments95%
Dexterity/Mobility84%

Activities you can do with Accessible Twitter