Results for Ning
Description
Ning allows you to create your own social networking space to collaborate with friends, colleagues, students and others in a user friendly way. However it does require some development as has been stated by Webmonkey "The Ning gnomes provide a number of custom PHP classes, both for interacting with the database and for quickly adding sprinkles of Ajax, web services, and other treats to an application. There's a lot there, and plumbing all of Ning's continually growing possibilities is a big job..." They give an example of a bookmark manager with the code.
Accessibility Testing Results
It is a shame that this service begins by requiring users to sign in with a captcha and offers no alternative. This reduced the scores. The other aspect was the way other users had developed their sites but if the standard Ning template is used most aspects are easy to read. YouTube is used for videos which means that captions and transcriptions can be added but we could not find any on the day of testing.
| # | Test | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible | ![]() |
There is a captcha and cookies plus JavaScript has to be enabled on the browser and this is true for every social networking group developed in Ning. However, the text is clear and the help centre offers a contact address. Once you have overcome the captcha problem, the log-in works well in Webbie and with a screen reader as the form is clearly labelled. |
| 2 | Image ALT Attributes | ![]() |
Some images have alt attributes but they do not describe what is in the image. Other images lack the alt tag completely. |
| 3 | Link Target Definitions | ![]() |
Some links lack titles or definitions whcih can cause confusion when linked to an image. |
| 4 | Frame Titles and Layout | ![]() |
There are no frames |
| 5 | Removal of Stylesheet | ![]() |
The site linearised in the correct order |
| 6 | Audio/Video Features | ![]() |
Videos and graphics have text descriptions and audio tracks but no captions or transcriptions were available on those viewed at the time of the evaluation |
| 7 | Video/animations - audio descriptions | ![]() |
Videos and graphics have text descriptions and audio tracks but the amount of audio description depends on the user. |
| 8 | Appropriate use of Tables | ![]() |
Tables are rarely used on the site, and have headers where required. |
| 9 | Tab Orderings Correct and Logical | ![]() |
Tab order is in a logical top-to-bottom or left-to-right format. |
| 10 | Page Functionality with Keyboard | ![]() |
The video You tube player is not accessible in certain browsers but otherwise keyboard access is good. |
| 11 | Accessibility of Text Editors | ![]() |
Although there are no rich text editors and the forms are accessible and well labelled, the use of captcha on the sign in page which reduces the score. |
| 12 | Appropriate Feedback with Forms | ![]() |
Feedback was appropriate, with no time restrictions enforced. |
| 13 | Contrast and Colour Check | ![]() |
Very good when using NIng colours but other sites have not always used good contrasting colours. |
| 14 | Page Integrity when Zooming | ![]() |
No problems occurred on the pages tested. |
| 15 | Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability | ![]() |
Serif fonts were found on some sites and some text was very small. There is no flashing or blinking content. |
Disability-Tailored Results
The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.
Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.
| Disability | Average Score |
|---|---|
| Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia) | 87% |
| Deaf/Hard of Hearing | 78% |
| Visual Stress | 78% |
| Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity | 75% |
| Cognitive Learning Disabilities | 70% |
| Blind and Severe Visual Impairments | 67% |
| Dexterity/Mobility | 58% |
| Colour Deficiencies | 56% |






