Results for Plurk

Web 2.0 Service
Test Average: 67%
Updated 10 August 2009

Description

Plurk is a short message social network service that allows you to communicate with friends - these friends can be held in 'Cliques' or groups. It is similar to Twitter and only allows for 140 characters in each message but keep count of how many you have used. Conversations can be held on a time line and in threads with links to Flickr, YouTube etc. There is a mobile version and privacy settings are available.

Accessibility Testing Results

The site could be so much more accessible if it was not for the time line coming at the top of the page. To reach the text form to fill in a plurk with a keyboard could be so easily achieved with a skip navigation link. Changes can be made to the look of the site in terms of colour and contrast levels whether by the browser or the application. Zoom is good and it is possible to linearise the pages. WebbIE allows for access to Plurk with screen reader but many links are unhelpfully named with the plurkbuddy link.

# Test Score Summary
1Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible Good The forms were easy to use and could be filled in using WebbIE - most had labels.
2Image ALT Attributes Fair Critical images on this site do not have text alternatives. This may cause screenreader users to have a different understanding of the content.
3Link Target Definitions Fair This site features ambiguous links which cannot be identified or distinguished by a screenreader; many just say plurkbuddy -/user/plurkbuddy.
4Frame Titles and Layout Excellent No frames or iframes, which can be disorientating for screen-readers, are used in the design.
5Removal of Stylesheet Excellent The page is still understandable and the time line linearises well but lists of words seem to appear at the bottom of the page in a random way.
6Audio/Video Features Fair No alternative formats are offered but in this case they may not be needed unless others add multimedia content. Text summaries are always possible
7Video/animations - audio descriptions Fair No alternative formats are offered but in this case they may not be needed unless others add multimedia content. Text summaries are always possible
8Appropriate use of Tables Fair Tables are used for layout in certain places but do not appear to affect readability although headers are missing.
9Tab Orderings Correct and Logical Good The structure appears to be all over the place but tab order survives in most places but could do with a skip navigation link.
10Page Functionality with Keyboard Excellent It is navigable but it is a problem having to go through the entire time line before reaching the text input for a message.
11Accessibility of Text Editors Excellent The text editor is a plain form and works well in a text browser.
12Appropriate Feedback with Forms Good This site often provides suitable feedback.
13Contrast and Colour Check Good Contrast levels vary but the site can be personalised and changes well when other browser options are chosen.
14Page Integrity when Zooming Excellent Pages zoom well.
15Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability Good The majority of text on the site is size 10 or smaller but it is sans-serif. The main form allows for size 14.

Disability-Tailored Results

The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.

Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.

Disability Average Score
Dexterity/Mobility84%
Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia)80%
Visual Stress78%
Cognitive Learning Disabilities70%
Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity67%
Blind and Severe Visual Impairments64%
Deaf/Hard of Hearing56%
Colour Deficiencies56%

Activities you can do with Plurk