Results for CommunityWalk

Web 2.0 Service
Test Average: 44%
Updated 27 August 2009

Description

Website that allows users to create points and paths on a map and get driving directions. Points can be annotated with text and images. Users can save maps and comment on others' maps as well as embed them in other websites. The community uses Google groups so links with your Google log-in which is a bit confusing if you logged into Community walk with another user name! There is a blog and help file and if you know how to add items to a Google map this site is easy to use and can produce a lovely story board of a walk or favourite area to share with others.

Accessibility Testing Results

Much of the site depends on Flash components which are not text browser or screen reader accessible. Keyboard access is also an issue and really mouse use is the only realistic way of making full use of the add-ins. The text can be small in some boxes but appears to zoom well in most places - odd overlays move onto other parts of the map when highly magnified.

# Test Score Summary
1Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible Poor There are no labels to the forms so careful navigation is required by a screen reader to catch the text linked to the form.
2Image ALT Attributes Fair Most images have alt tags and are understandable but the maps are not screen reader accessible.
3Link Target Definitions Poor This site features ambiguous links which cannot be identified or distinguished by a screenreader.
4Frame Titles and Layout Fair This site makes use of frames - the frames are not named. This may cause problems for some screenreader users.
5Removal of Stylesheet Poor The site is unusable without the stylesheet.
6Audio/Video Features Fair Multimedia items on this site offer a text description.
7Video/animations - audio descriptions Fair Audio descriptions of the maps would be helpful but are not part of the service. Text summaries can be added.
8Appropriate use of Tables Excellent Tables are not used for the design of this website.
9Tab Orderings Correct and Logical Excellent Tab order is in a logical and consistent top-to-bottom or left-to-right format.
10Page Functionality with Keyboard Poor This site requires a pointing device as it makes heavy use of drag-and-drop operations.
11Accessibility of Text Editors Poor Text editor menu is not accessible with the screenreader or keyboard.
12Appropriate Feedback with Forms Excellent The product provides suitable feedback when the user performs an action.
13Contrast and Colour Check Good No contrast problems.
14Page Integrity when Zooming Excellent The website maintains the layout and usability of all critical areas perfectly when zoomed.
15Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability Good The majority of text on the site is size ten, which is readable but may be uncomfortable for some.

Disability-Tailored Results

The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.

Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.

Disability Average Score
Visual Stress78%
Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia)67%
Deaf/Hard of Hearing67%
Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity58%
Colour Deficiencies56%
Cognitive Learning Disabilities42%
Blind and Severe Visual Impairments36%
Dexterity/Mobility25%

Activities you can do with CommunityWalk