Results for Linoit

Web 2.0 Service
Test Average: 56%
Updated 10 August 2009

Description

Mouse driven stickies idea for posting notes on a corkboard and sharing these notes with others by linking up with groups or using e-mail. Stickies can be chosen by their colour and sorted, font types and sizes can be chosen in edit mode with the chance to add pictures etc. It is possible to set up todo lists, notes and reminders. Corkboards can be shared and made public if required.

Accessibility Testing Results

This site really has to be enjoyed with the use of the mouse, dragging and dropping, reshaping and changing. It is possible to read the results in a text browser but it is not ideal for this type of dynamic content. Take away the style sheets etc and really the site is unusable but it is a highly visual and tactile type of interaction with ideas which can help memory skills.

# Test Score Summary
1Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible Fair No form labels which may make it hard for a screenreader user to know what the forms require. There is no captcha system, which avoids some accessibility problems.
2Image ALT Attributes Good Some images lack alt tags but the main ones used as links to different parts of the service work well.
3Link Target Definitions Good Most links are uniquely identified so can be understood by a screenreader.
4Frame Titles and Layout Excellent No frames or iframes, which can be disorientating for screen-readers, are used in the design.
5Removal of Stylesheet Poor The site is unusable without the stylesheet.
6Audio/Video Features Excellent N/A - This site does not deal with multimedia content.
7Video/animations - audio descriptions Poor The service is designed to allow users to add sticky notes to a desktop and it is not possible to add audio descriptions.
8Appropriate use of Tables Fair Some tables are used within the site, but do not have headings.
9Tab Orderings Correct and Logical Excellent Tab order is in a logical and consistent top-to-bottom or left-to-right format.
10Page Functionality with Keyboard Poor Critical functinoality of this site requires the use of a pointing device.
11Accessibility of Text Editors Poor Text editor is not accessible with the screenreader or keyboard.
12Appropriate Feedback with Forms Excellent The product provides suitable feedback when the user performs an action.
13Contrast and Colour Check Good Some menu text fails validation due to blue-on-blue. Overall contrast largely depends upon background and item colours set by the user.
14Page Integrity when Zooming Excellent Zooms surprisingly well.
15Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability Good The majority of text on the site is size ten, which is readable but may be uncomfortable for some. Sans-serif fonts are used, and there is no flashing or blinking content.

Disability-Tailored Results

The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.

Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.

Disability Average Score
Deaf/Hard of Hearing89%
Visual Stress78%
Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia)67%
Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity63%
Cognitive Learning Disabilities53%
Blind and Severe Visual Impairments50%
Colour Deficiencies45%
Dexterity/Mobility33%

Activities you can do with Linoit