Results for Campusbug

Web 2.0 Service
Test Average: 49%
Updated 26 August 2009

Description

Campusbug offers a wide range of activities for teachers such as sharing documents, games, pictures, videos, tests, flash cards, news along with usual social networking services. Users can ask questions within the community there is a very good demonstration video and samples plus a store for buyig Campusbug items such as T-shirts etc.

Accessibility Testing Results

This is an easy site to use with good sized text and colour contrast levels and yet it fails on so many basic items such as correct use of labels and alt tags. It is possible to use in a text browser and the rich text editor boxes are keyboard accessible after much tabbing! The new version provides users with a collection of tags that just run into each other and do not make easy reading.

# Test Score Summary
1Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible Poor There are no labels for forms within this product - this may create problems with some screenreaders and there is a captcha with no alternative.
2Image ALT Attributes Poor Critical images on this site do not have text alternatives. This may cause screenreader users to have a different understanding of the content.
3Link Target Definitions Poor Some critical links have targets which may seem ambiguous for screenreader users.
4Frame Titles and Layout Excellent No frames or iframes, which can be disorientating for screen-readers, are used in the design.
5Removal of Stylesheet Poor Changing settings requires drag and drop.
6Audio/Video Features Fair Videos can be added to the site but there are no methods for adding captions only text descriptions and tags.
7Video/animations - audio descriptions Fair Photos and videos can be added to the site but there are methods for adding additional audio descriptions. Text descriptions can be added.
8Appropriate use of Tables Poor Tables are used to construct this site - this may cause some screenreaders to read the content in the wrong order.
9Tab Orderings Correct and Logical Excellent Tab order is in a logical and consistent top-to-bottom or left-to-right format.
10Page Functionality with Keyboard Poor Critical components of this site require the use of a pointing device.
11Accessibility of Text Editors Excellent TinyMCE editor is used for text editing. It is keyboard accessible.
12Appropriate Feedback with Forms Excellent The product provides suitable feedback when the user performs an action.
13Contrast and Colour Check Excellent No contrast problems. Most elements meet AA standard but not AAA.
14Page Integrity when Zooming Excellent The website maintains the layout and usability of all critical areas perfectly when zoomed.
15Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability Good The majority of text on the site is size ten, which is readable but may be uncomfortable for some.

Disability-Tailored Results

The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.

Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.

Disability Average Score
Visual Stress89%
Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia)73%
Deaf/Hard of Hearing67%
Colour Deficiencies67%
Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity63%
Cognitive Learning Disabilities53%
Dexterity/Mobility50%
Blind and Severe Visual Impairments39%

Activities you can do with Campusbug