Results for frappr

Web 2.0 Service
Test Average: 42%
Updated 10 August 2009

Description

Users can leave photos at locations on the Google map along with messages. Users can have their own maps, to create a travel-log for example and to offer this to others on their own webpages by copying some code or automatically linking to a MySpace social networking space.

Accessibility Testing Results

This is a good way of learning about other parts of the world by linking users on maps but the problem at the outset for screen reader and keyboard users is that the maps are manipulated in a Flash Player which is only accessible in some browsers. Once clicked into the map it is then possible to navigate using a keyboard. Zooming does not work well with the maps and they are only on offer in standard and concise format. The text zooms well but is not easy to read when wrapped around the small map.

# Test Score Summary
1Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible Poor There are no labels for forms within this product - this may create problems with some screenreaders.
2Image ALT Attributes Poor Critical images on this site do not have text alternatives. This may cause screenreader users to have a different understanding of the content.
3Link Target Definitions Excellent All links, including images which would otherwise be ambiguous, have titles to uniquely identify them.
4Frame Titles and Layout Excellent No frames or iframes, which can be disorientating for screen-readers, are used in the design.
5Removal of Stylesheet Excellent The page is still understandable and functional when it is viewed as a linear document, with no styles.
6Audio/Video Features Poor No alternative formats are offered when adding map positions.
7Video/animations - audio descriptions Poor No alternative formats are offered when adding map positions.
8Appropriate use of Tables Poor Tables are used to construct this site - this may cause some screenreaders to read the content in the wrong order.
9Tab Orderings Correct and Logical Excellent Tab order is in a logical and consistent top-to-bottom or left-to-right format.
10Page Functionality with Keyboard Poor This site cannot be navigated without a pointing device.
11Accessibility of Text Editors Poor Text editor is not accessible with the screenreader or keyboard.
12Appropriate Feedback with Forms Excellent The product provides suitable feedback when the user performs an action.
13Contrast and Colour Check Good Contrast of map pin captions passes AA but not AAA. Site contrast levels are otherwise acceptable.
14Page Integrity when Zooming Fair The map doesn't resize so an external magnification program would be required.
15Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability Fair Particularly small text prevalent throughout the site, which may be difficult to view without zooming the page.

Disability-Tailored Results

The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.

Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.

Disability Average Score
Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia)67%
Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity54%
Cognitive Learning Disabilities44%
Deaf/Hard of Hearing44%
Visual Stress44%
Blind and Severe Visual Impairments42%
Colour Deficiencies33%
Dexterity/Mobility25%

Activities you can do with frappr