Results for eHow

Web 2.0 Service
Test Average: 71%
Updated 26 August 2009

Description

'How to do things' from planning a happy weekend to more serious items. Text-based or video instructional website covering a wide range of topics. Items are provided by members and can be shared across sites.

Accessibility Testing Results

The site is very user friendly and is easy to navigate. It has easy to follow categories and although some alt tags and labels are missing most of the site can be viewed in text only mode. That is unless the Flash How to videos are used or uploaded images. Some browsers do not allow for keyboard access to the player. Most text can be zoomed and contrast levels are good.

# Test Score Summary
1Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible Poor No labels are available to help the screen reader user register on the site. There is no alternative captcha. Sign in has some labels.
2Image ALT Attributes Fair Very few of the loaded images have alternative text.
3Link Target Definitions Excellent All links, including images which would otherwise be ambiguous, have titles to uniquely identify them.
4Frame Titles and Layout Excellent No frames or iframes, which can be disorientating for screen-readers, are used in the design.
5Removal of Stylesheet Excellent The page is still understandable and functional when it is viewed as a linear document, with no styles.
6Audio/Video Features Good The site links to videos and text explanations about how to do things. There are no specific ways of adding captions or subtitles. Text descriptions are available.
7Video/animations - audio descriptions Fair The site links to videos and text explanations about how to do things. There are no specific ways of adding audio descriptions. Text descriptions are available.
8Appropriate use of Tables Excellent Tables are not used for the design of this website.
9Tab Orderings Correct and Logical Excellent Tab order is in a logical and consistent top-to-bottom or left-to-right format.
10Page Functionality with Keyboard Excellent The website is fully accessible without the use of a mouse.
11Accessibility of Text Editors Poor Text editor is not accessible with the screenreader or keyboard.
12Appropriate Feedback with Forms Excellent The product provides suitable feedback when the user performs an action.
13Contrast and Colour Check Good Most heading elements and some buttons have technically invalid contrast, according to the WAI, but they are very borderline cases (3.9:1).
14Page Integrity when Zooming Excellent The website maintains the layout and usability of all critical areas perfectly when zoomed.
15Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability Good The majority of text on the site is size ten, which is readable but may be uncomfortable for some.

Disability-Tailored Results

The following table shows how well the product performs for people with disabilities, as listed in the Disabilities section.

Percentages do not indicate how much of a site is accessible. They indicate the average figure of test results relevant to each disability. Select a disability to see which tests are relevant to it.

Disability Average Score
Specific Learning Differences (including Dyslexia)87%
Partially Sighted and Visual Acuity83%
Deaf/Hard of Hearing78%
Visual Stress78%
Cognitive Learning Disabilities70%
Blind and Severe Visual Impairments69%
Colour Deficiencies56%
Dexterity/Mobility50%

Activities you can do with eHow